Lost 3/9/10

Wherein we discuss scripted events which are broadcast
over analog and digital channels.

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby kenzo » Mar 11th, 2010 @ 4:18pm

James-Kond wrote:Maybe he touched Richard at a special place?

We can only hope James, we can only hope.
User avatar
kenzo
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Apr 21st, 2009 @ 6:01pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby MrBiggs » Mar 12th, 2010 @ 7:52am

kenzo wrote:So, Richard received eternal life as a 'gift' because of Jacob, but Richard sees it as more of a curse. And he touched pretty much every important character before coming to the island, everyone must have a 'gift' of their own, and it doesn't necessarily have to be eternal life. Hurley's and Miles's could be their ability to talk with the dead (which have proven invaluable to their plans so far). A number of people have demonstrated that they're unkillable under most situations, especially if death is coming at them from their own hands. Are there any other examples? I'm thinkin' that everyone starts manifesting secret powers in the not so near future...


That doesn't work for Hurley at least because Jacob touched Hurley after Hurley started talking to dead people. I'm not saying that you're wrong just that your example with Hurley doesn't work.

Has Richard's name been seen on any of the lists? I can't remember, but I'm interested in why Jacob is touching and "gifting" people who aren't candidates like Kate and possibly Richard.

Also, going back to last season's finale, this could explain why Juliet had a flashback without Jacob touching her. Everyone else got touched and now can't successfully commit suicide, but she wasn't touched so when she blew up the bomb she could die. There's got to be something more with her, though, since she somehow apparently knows that the sideways reality exists.
User avatar
MrBiggs
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mar 19th, 2009 @ 4:44pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby kenzo » Mar 12th, 2010 @ 2:02pm

MrBiggs wrote:That doesn't work for Hurley at least because Jacob touched Hurley after Hurley started talking to dead people. I'm not saying that you're wrong just that your example with Hurley doesn't work.

Has Richard's name been seen on any of the lists? I can't remember, but I'm interested in why Jacob is touching and "gifting" people who aren't candidates like Kate and possibly Richard.

We only saw a flashback of Jacob touching Hurley before he came to the island the second time because he gave Hurley the suitcase on that occasion and they wanted to integrate that into the show. But just because we were shown that scene, it doesn't mean that Hurley wasn't touched at some earlier point in his life. Just because Kate and Richard weren't given numbers that we saw, doesn't mean that their names weren't on the rock but crossed out either.
User avatar
kenzo
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Apr 21st, 2009 @ 6:01pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby LiQuid » Mar 12th, 2010 @ 2:08pm

I'm I the only one uncomfortable with all the talk of Jacob touching people? I know the joke was already made, but like, seriously. Isn't there some other term we can use for it?
User avatar
LiQuid
 
Posts: 4256
Joined: Mar 9th, 2009 @ 8:57pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby slinkdickens » Mar 12th, 2010 @ 4:53pm

MrBiggs wrote:That doesn't work for Hurley at least because Jacob touched Hurley after Hurley started talking to dead people. I'm not saying that you're wrong just that your example with Hurley doesn't work.

Has Richard's name been seen on any of the lists? I can't remember, but I'm interested in why Jacob is touching and "gifting" people who aren't candidates like Kate and possibly Richard.


Kate might've been a candidate when Jacob touched her. Her stepfather's last name, Austen, is not crossed out in the Lighthouse. It's not shown in the Cave, but according to that website I linked, "It has been confirmed by Carlton Cuse that Kate's name was on the cave wall, but regrettably did not make the final edit. He also confirmed her name was crossed out on the cave wall."
slinkdickens
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Apr 16th, 2009 @ 1:30pm

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby kenzo » Mar 12th, 2010 @ 5:05pm

LiQuid wrote:I'm I the only one uncomfortable with all the talk of Jacob touching people? I know the joke was already made, but like, seriously. Isn't there some other term we can use for it?

How about, when he 'violated their destinies'?
User avatar
kenzo
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Apr 21st, 2009 @ 6:01pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby MrBiggs » Mar 13th, 2010 @ 7:45am

slinkdickens wrote:Kate might've been a candidate when Jacob touched her. Her stepfather's last name, Austen, is not crossed out in the Lighthouse. It's not shown in the Cave, but according to that website I linked, "It has been confirmed by Carlton Cuse that Kate's name was on the cave wall, but regrettably did not make the final edit. He also confirmed her name was crossed out on the cave wall."


Ooh, I didn't hear that. I'm not a Kate hater so I'm glad she's a candidate. Though do you really want the girl who always runs to stay and guard your island?
User avatar
MrBiggs
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mar 19th, 2009 @ 4:44pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby kenzo » Mar 13th, 2010 @ 2:23pm

MrBiggs wrote:Ooh, I didn't hear that. I'm not a Kate hater so I'm glad she's a candidate.

How are you glad about anything Kate-related.
User avatar
kenzo
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Apr 21st, 2009 @ 6:01pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby MrBiggs » Mar 14th, 2010 @ 6:38am

kenzo wrote:
MrBiggs wrote:Ooh, I didn't hear that. I'm not a Kate hater so I'm glad she's a candidate.

How are you glad about anything Kate-related.
User avatar
MrBiggs
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mar 19th, 2009 @ 4:44pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby kenzo » Mar 14th, 2010 @ 1:11pm

MrBiggs wrote:I'm not a Kate hater

I feel bad for you.
User avatar
kenzo
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Apr 21st, 2009 @ 6:01pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby BEARinaMANSUIT » Mar 14th, 2010 @ 1:53pm

Claire needs to make good on her promise to kill Kate.
User avatar
BEARinaMANSUIT
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Mar 14th, 2010 @ 12:06am
Location: Bostonia, California

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby James-Kond » Mar 14th, 2010 @ 1:54pm

kenzo wrote:
MrBiggs wrote:I'm not a Kate hater

I feel bad for you.

I wanted to say the same, but then remembered I kinda not hate Kate too, so yeah.
It all started with a bang.
User avatar
James-Kond
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Mar 8th, 2009 @ 1:13pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Lost 3/9/10

Postby barrbarr » Mar 15th, 2010 @ 5:43pm

Govir wrote:
Klendathu wrote:Sawyer also remains the only character touched by Jacob before the atom bomb wiped a part of history. All other characters were touched in a time-line the atom bomb wiped from history.


Do you say this because he was touched when he was younger? Kate was also touched when she was younger, when she tried to steal a Lunchbox from a store.


I think Klendathu is right about Sawyer, because Sawyer was 8 when he met Jacob and that would make it 1976 when Jacob touched him, a whole year before the bomb went off. Also Kate was touched after the bomb went off because she was born in 1977 and she was touched when she was 10. So that would make Sawyer the only character who could have possibly been touched by Jacob in the Alternate time line
barrbarr
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Mar 25th, 2009 @ 7:49am

Previous

Return to TV and Movies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest