Mr_eX wrote:First one was ok and X2 I thought was great.
Raine wrote:Where's all this love for X-Men 2 come from? That movie sucked. It sucked hard, in many different ways.
jinpei05 wrote:Better than the first one.
Raine wrote:At least we all can agree that the third movie sucked
LiQuid wrote:Raine wrote:At least we all can agree that the third movie sucked
No we can't.
Raine wrote:That. . . may actually be a reasonable point of view to have. I think it was you that said you thought Batman and Robin was better than the Dark Knight because Dark Knight was "GRRR, I'm dark and serious!" and Batman and Robin was crazy, comicy-booky slapstick action, and I'm guessing there's a similar train of thought there.
ReturnOfTheOgre wrote:BEST case scenario, the movie bombs, blah blah blah
LiQuid wrote:ReturnOfTheOgre wrote:BEST case scenario, the movie bombs, blah blah blah
Jesus Christ dude. Try having some fun at the movies once.
Raine wrote:jinpei05 wrote:Better than the first one.
I dunno about that. It had better ideas than the first one, I'll give it that, but it wasn't executed as well as the first one. . . which doesn't say much, because the first one was obviously and sloppily taking cues from The Matrix.
At least we all can agree that the third movie sucked, and the Wolverine movie was dumber than a sack of hammers.
Master Higgins wrote:X-Men 2 isn't just the best X-Men movie, it's one of the best superhero movies, period.
X-Men 3 and Wolverine are easily among the worst.
Master Higgins wrote:X-Men 3 and Wolverine are easily among the worst.
Hyperbole is par for the course here, you should know this.LiQuid wrote:You guys are so full of shit. Really X-men 3 among the worst superhero movies of all time? Have you guys never seen the shit heaps that are Daredevil, Electra, or Ghostrider?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests