
Grimlock wrote:
Episode 69, dudes.



Grimlock wrote:
Episode 69, dudes.


Bobloblaw wrote:Grimlock wrote:
Episode 69, dudes.
Strange things are afoot at the Circle K.



kenzo wrote:Also, I'll bet you a small fortune that Shane didn't review MGS4, precisely because he felt susceptible to bias.
Mr_eX wrote:Table top RPG talk is the WORST
IcarusII wrote:Ryan, you don't have to defend your Mario Galaxy 2 review score and I don't know why you think you have to do so on this podcast and on The Gamespy Debriefings. I hope you're not getting a kick from all this attention you're getting, as if the nontroversy is garnering you some spotlight. I hope this attention doesn't color your reviews of future high profile games.
As for the discussion of reviewer predisposition to certain games (your ex. GTA4)... I don't think it's fair to judge them if you're in a similar position. Sometimes one can get familiar enough with a podcaster/game reviewer's tastes and biases through listening to them week after week that - no matter how they try to deflect their own statements with layered sarcasm and irony or a funny voice - a grain of salt has to be taken when reading their reviews.
It's the Shane Bettenhausen effect. After listening to him for a while you begin to question his objectivity in his reviews of games that belong to series or franchises that he kept spooging about on episodes of Retronauts or 1Up Yours. If he didn't keep referring to himself as the "number 1 MGS fan ever" prior to reviewing MGS4, I wouldn't had felt so odd reading his review.
Ryan Scott I'm sure you're a consumate professional, but I know how much you love Street Fighter...
Anyway, Gemma Arterton is hot. Prince of Persia flick was not. E3 next week, woo! It's gonna be great listening to you guys sound exasperated and tired.
kenzo wrote:You're new to the forums, so there's no way you could know... but just FYI IcarusII: Ryan Scott won't read that.
Also, I'll bet you a small fortune that Shane didn't review MGS4, precisely because he felt susceptible to bias.
Lombaszko wrote:Three man reviews in EGM were the best. Does anyone know if the new EGM has those?
jinpei05 wrote:Actually, he didn't review it because played the entire game as part of a user feedback retreat in Japan that Konami held before the game's release.
JayZii wrote:I was going to say I enjoyed this episode until the end when Ryan implied that Retronauts is not worth mentioning as a long running 1UP podcast. For shame Mr. Scott, I thought I knew you.
Rydog wrote:kenzo wrote:You're new to the forums, so there's no way you could know... but just FYI IcarusII: Ryan Scott won't read that.
I totally just proved you wrong!




jinpei05 wrote:kenzo wrote:Also, I'll bet you a small fortune that Shane didn't review MGS4, precisely because he felt susceptible to bias.
Actually, he didn't review it because he played the entire game as part of a user feedback retreat in Japan that Konami held before the game's release.

jinpei05 wrote:So Fitch doesn't find Kim Yun-Jin attractive...


jinpei05 wrote:So Fitch doesn't find Kim Yun-Jin attractive...

deadairis wrote:Mr_eX wrote:Table top RPG talk is the WORST
You're the worst!
Now to roll to see if my Social check succeeded...

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests